Same charity, same £5 entry, 110 artists: why I Love Live prize draws raised from £5 to £68,733
A natural experiment hidden in one charity campaign. Stagehand ran the same prize draw, at the same price, for more than 110 artists. Some of the most famous names in music raised double digits. The pattern says a famous name alone does not carry a draw.
- Raised
- £908,976
- Year
- 2021
- Platform
- Crowdfunder UK
- Entry price
- £5
An independent breakdown by The Prize Draw Company. We did not run this draw. We studied it.
Between late 2020 and the end of 2023, one UK charity ran more or less the same prize draw over a hundred times. Same beneficiary: Stagehand, the hardship fund for live-event production crew. Same platform: Crowdfunder. Same price: £5 an entry. Same umbrella brand: I Love Live. The only things that really changed from one draw to the next were the artist, the prize and the moment.
The results ranged from £5 to £68,733.
That spread is the point. When you hold the charity, the platform, the price and the brand still and let only the artist and prize vary, you get something rare in fundraising: a natural experiment. Mark Knopfler's signed Stratocaster raised £68,733 from 3,307 supporters. In the same campaign family, a Paul McCartney signed set-list raised £140 from 12 supporters. Knopfler is not 491 times more famous than McCartney. So if it is not fame, what is it?
This case study reads the whole dataset rather than a single draw, because the lesson lives in the contrast. The short version: a famous name does not carry a prize draw on its own. What moved these draws was the combination of an artist actively promoting it to their own audience, a prize with real provenance that fans wanted, and urgency. We can show the pattern is strong. We are careful below about what the figures can and cannot prove.
At a glance
- Campaign: #ILoveLive (Stagehand, with Crowdfunder), run across 2020 to 2021, plus a third round, #ILoveLive3, in December 2023.
- Beneficiary: Stagehand, the PSA Welfare and Benevolent Fund, giving hardship grants to UK live-event production crew left without work in the Covid shutdown.
- Mechanic: paid-entry prize draw. £5 per entry, multiple entries permitted, with a free postal route that keeps it legal without a lottery licence. Crowdfunder waived its platform fees.
- Scale: more than 110 separate artist draws, each on its own Crowdfunder page, running side by side under one brand.
- Range of outcomes: from £5 (a single entry, refunded) to £68,733, for the same charity at the same price.
- Campaign totals: £535,840 in the first round (2020) and £373,136 in the second (2021), roughly £908,000 combined.
- Top raise: Mark Knopfler's signed Fender Stratocaster, £68,733 from 3,307 supporters.
- Volume leader: MUSE's signed Manson guitar, 4,092 supporters, £60,093.
- Highest spend per supporter: Frank Turner's lifetime guestlist pass, £53,706 from 2,540 supporters, an average of £21.14 each.
- The floor: Paul McCartney signed set-list, £140 from 12 supporters (December 2023).
- The only failure: Maisie Peters signed set-list, £5 from a single entry, refunded under Crowdfunder's all-or-nothing model.
The natural experiment
A natural experiment is one where the world, not a researcher, holds most of the variables still. I Love Live does that almost perfectly. Every draw shared a charity, a platform, a price and a brand. What varied was the artist, the prize and the timing. That lets us line up draws against each other and ask what the difference in result tracks with.
Start with the two ends.
The ceiling. The biggest raises were all 2020 to 2021 draws built on a specific object or a piece of access, not an autograph:
- Mark Knopfler, signed tour Stratocaster: £68,733 from 3,307 supporters. Knopfler is closely associated with the live-touring world the cause serves. Cause, prize and artist were tightly aligned.
- MUSE, signed Manson guitar: £60,093 from 4,092 supporters. The volume leader of the whole campaign.
- Frank Turner, lifetime guestlist pass for two: £53,706 from 2,540 supporters. A recurring-access prize that pulled the highest spend per head of any draw.
- Robert Smith of The Cure, signed Schecter: £41,005. Iron Maiden, Jackson guitar: £38,700. Radiohead, vintage Stratocaster: £31,032. Pete Townshend, gold Stratocaster: £28,026. elbow, Eric Clapton, Liam Gallagher and others all sat in the £18,000 to £30,000 band.
The floor. Now the December 2023 round, #ILoveLive3. Same charity, same platform, same £5, same brand. The prize architecture was downgraded across the board to signed set-lists, with no provenance object and no urgency. The names were as big as music gets:
- Paul McCartney, signed set-list: £140 from 12 supporters.
- Michael Jackson, rare tour memorabilia: £140 from 9 supporters.
- New Order, signed set-lists: £110 from 3 supporters.
- Nile Rodgers, signed set-list: £85 from 6 supporters.
- Ed Sheeran, signed set-list: £55 from 5 supporters.
- The Prodigy, signed set-list: £35 from 5 supporters.
- The 1975 and Bring Me The Horizon, signed set-lists: £20 each, from 2 supporters each.
- Maisie Peters, signed set-list: £5 from a single entry, the only draw in 110+ marked "Unsuccessful" and refunded.
The gap between the two ends is enormous and it does not track fame. McCartney, Jackson, Sheeran and Rodgers are not less famous than elbow or Frank Turner. Something other than the name is doing the work.
The cleaner comparisons
Here is where the discipline matters. Between the 2020 to 2021 rounds and the 2023 round, three things changed at once: the urgency (a live-events workforce in genuine crisis during the shutdown, versus a calmer 2023), the prize quality (provenance objects and access passes, versus generic set-lists), and, very probably, the amount of artist promotion. When three variables move together you cannot read a clean cause off the totals. So the high-profile contrasts, dramatic as they are, are confounded:
- The 1975, twice. A signed Fender guitar in 2020 to 2021 raised £3,135. The same band's signed set-list in 2023 raised £20. That is 157 times, same band, same charity, same platform. But two variables moved: urgency and prize. It tells you the package matters; it cannot tell you which part.
- Knopfler versus McCartney. £68,733 against £140 is 491 times on raise and 276 times on supporters. Again, different years, different prizes, different promotion. A vivid headline, not a controlled result.
To get closer to a cause, hold the round still and let the prize vary. Inside the single 2020 to 2021 round, with urgency roughly constant for everyone, the prize architecture splits the field cleanly:
- Provenance instruments and access passes: £18,000 to £68,733.
- Generic prizes in the very same round: Robbie Williams, a guitar plus typewritten lyrics, £2,028. Sam Smith, VIP tickets plus signed merch, £1,822. Disclosure, a retail AKAI keyboard, £460. Craig David, a signed studio mixer, £395. Camelphat, a signed plaque, £100.
That comparison is much harder to wave away. Same campaign, same urgency, same price, and the draws built on a real object with a story raised one to two orders of magnitude more than the draws built on generic kit. Urgency cannot explain that gap, because urgency was shared. Prize quality, and the promotion that tends to travel with a genuinely donated personal object, can.
Two more comparisons sharpen it further.
The same artist, with and without an owned event. Ed Sheeran's 2023 signed set-list raised £55 from 5 supporters. The same artist's 2022 intimate-gig draw at Union Chapel, an owned event he actively fronted and promoted, raised over £200,000 from around 6,000 supporters. Nile Rodgers tells a smaller version of the same story: his 2020 to 2021 signed Stratocaster is recorded in the research bank at £12,455, against £85 for his 2023 set-list, roughly 147 times, same artist. The variable that moved was not the name. It was whether the artist had something real to offer and was actively driving it.
The prize versus no prize. The single cleanest test in the whole campaign needs no artist at all. Stagehand ran one straight donation appeal with no prize attached, "Donate to Support the Unsung Heroes", inside the same campaign, to the same audience, for the same cause. It reached 23% of its target while the prize draws around it routinely passed 100%. On that comparison, the only thing that changed was the presence of a prize, and adding one roughly multiplied the giving rate four to five times.
There is also an audience-shape finding worth naming, all of it derived from raise divided by supporters. Collector and super-fan prizes pull harder per head: Frank Turner's lifetime pass averaged £21.14 a supporter, Iron Maiden £21.03, Knopfler £20.78. Mass-appeal acts volume up instead: MUSE drew the most supporters of any draw at 4,092 but averaged £14.69, and Liam Gallagher averaged just £10.37. Both routes work. Choosing between them is an audience decision as much as a prize decision.
What charity teams should take from this
1. Ask for promotion, not permission. A famous supporter's name on a Crowdfunder page does almost nothing on its own; the 2023 floor proves it. What moves a draw is the supporter actively posting it to their own audience through their own channels. Put that in the ask, in writing, as a deliverable, not a hope. The reach is the channel, and the channel is the thing you are actually securing.
2. Get a prize with provenance or access, never a generic signed item. The single sharpest split in the data, even with urgency held constant, is provenance object or recurring-access pass (£18,000 to £68,733) versus generic signed merchandise (£100 to £2,000). A real instrument with a traceable life, or a pass that keeps giving, is a different product from an autograph. Specify the object, the story and the access. If the only prize on offer is a signed set-list, expect a set-list result.
3. If you have a warm audience, a draw beats a plain appeal. The no-prize control raised 23% of target against the draws' 100%-plus. Where you have an audience that cares and a supporter who can offer something, attaching a prize is not decoration; it is roughly a four to five times multiplier on the giving rate. Match the prize to the audience you have: collector prizes for super-fans who bid hard, broad-appeal prizes for reach.
4. Treat the famous name as a floor, not a plan. The most useful and most uncomfortable lesson here is that the biggest names in the world raised double digits when the levers you control were absent. Plan as if the name contributes a starting line, and put your effort into the parts you can actually move: secured promotion, the right prize, and a real deadline. A foundation's own audience, mobilised with the right prize, is the engine. The celebrity's fame in the abstract is not.
What this case study doesn't claim
It does not claim to have proven a cause. This is correlation across many draws, not a controlled trial. Urgency, prize quality and artist promotion changed together between the urgent 2020 to 2021 rounds and the calmer 2023 round, so the most eye-catching contrasts (the 157 times on The 1975, the 491 times on Knopfler versus McCartney) cannot be pinned on any one factor. The within-round comparison and the no-prize control are cleaner, and they point firmly at prize and promotion, but artist promotion was never systematically recorded, so it remains an unobserved variable throughout. We can say the pattern is strong and consistent. We cannot rank the three levers from the figures alone.
Two narrower limits. Supporter counts are verified for the headline draws and the 2023 floor, but several 2020 to 2021 mid-tier figures have raise totals only, with entrant numbers unverified; the spend-per-supporter averages are derived from raise divided by supporters and are presented as derived, not reported. And the no-prize control's "23% of target" is recorded in the research bank from the campaign page; the underlying project page was not separately scraped, so it is treated as a ratio rather than a precise pound figure.
None of this softens the practical takeaway. Whatever the exact weighting, the floor is real: the most famous names in music raised almost nothing when the prize was generic, the moment was calm and the artist was not visibly promoting. That is the warning a charity with a famous supporter needs to hear before it banks on the name.
Sources
Figures captured from the live Crowdfunder project pages and press, recorded in the research bank on 22 May 2026. Per-draw raise totals are HIGH confidence; entrant counts are HIGH confidence where a supporter number is given and UNVERIFIED for several 2020 to 2021 mid-tier rows; spend-per-supporter figures are derived.
- Campaign total, first round: NME, "The #ILoveLive campaign has raised over £500,000 for UK stage crew" (December 2020):
nme.com/news/music/the-ilovelive-campaign-has-raised-over-500000-for-uk-stage-crew-2845444 - Campaign total, second round (£373,136): Crowdfunder, "Stagehand launches I Love Live 2":
crowdfunder.co.uk/stories/stagehand-launches-ilovelive-2 - Mark Knopfler signed Stratocaster (£68,733 / 3,307):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-mark-knopfler-guitar - MUSE signed guitar (£60,093 / 4,092):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-muse-signed-guitar - Frank Turner lifetime guestlist (£53,706 / 2,540):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-frank-turner-lifetime-guestlist - Robert Smith / The Cure (£41,005 / 2,375):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-robert-smith-the-cure-guitar - Iron Maiden (£38,700 / 1,840):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-iron-maiden-guitar - Radiohead (£31,032 / 2,065):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-radiohead-guitar - Pete Townshend (£28,026 / 1,604):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-pete-townshend-guitar - elbow (£22,694 / 1,634):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-elbow-signed-guitar - Eric Clapton (£20,499 / 1,195):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-eric-clapton-guitar - Liam Gallagher (£18,519 / 1,785):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-liam-gallagher-guitar - The 1975 signed Fender guitar, 2020 to 2021 (£3,135):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-the-1975-signed-fender-guitar - Robbie Williams (£2,028), Sam Smith (£1,822), Disclosure (£460), Craig David (£395), Camelphat (£100): respective Crowdfunder
/p/pages, recorded in the bank. - Paul McCartney (£140 / 12):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-paul-mccartney-signed-set-list - Michael Jackson memorabilia (£140 / 9):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-rare-michael-jackson-tour-memorabilia - New Order (£110 / 3):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-new-order-signed-set-lists - Nile Rodgers signed set-list (£85 / 6):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-nile-rodgers-signed-set-list. 2020 to 2021 signed Stratocaster (£12,455) recorded in the research bank note. - Ed Sheeran signed set-list (£55 / 5):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-ed-sheeran-signed-set-list - The Prodigy (£35 / 5):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-the-prodigy-signed-set-list - The 1975 signed set-list (£20 / 2):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-the-1975-signed-set-list - Bring Me The Horizon (£20 / 2):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-bring-me-the-horizon-signed-set-list - Maisie Peters, the only "Unsuccessful" draw (£5, refunded):
crowdfunder.co.uk/p/win-maisie-peters-signed-set-list - No-prize control, "Donate to Support the Unsung Heroes" (23% of target): recorded in the research bank from the campaign page; underlying project page not separately scraped.
- Ed Sheeran 2022 intimate-gig draw, For One Night Only at Union Chapel (over £200,000 from around 6,000): Shout 85258, "Intimate Ed Sheeran gig raises more than £200k":
giveusashout.org/latest/intimate-ed-sheeran-gig-raises-more-than-200k-for-shout-providing-vital-support-to-people-struggling-to-cope/
Full analysis and confidence notes: research bank i-love-live-analysis.md and candidates-full.md sections B-2 and B-3.
Questions this case answers
Why did some I Love Live prize draws raise tens of thousands while others raised £20?
All of these draws ran for the same charity, Stagehand, on the same platform, Crowdfunder, at the same £5 entry, under the same campaign brand. The ones that raised most combined three things: an artist actively promoting the draw to their own audience, a prize with real provenance that fans actually wanted (a specific instrument with a story, or recurring access), and the urgency of the Covid live-events shutdown. The ones that raised least had generic prizes, ran in the calmer December 2023 round, and show little sign of artist promotion. The figures alone cannot prove which of those three did the work, because they tend to move together, but they are strong evidence that the famous name on its own was not the engine.
Does a famous supporter guarantee a successful prize draw?
No. In the December 2023 round, a Paul McCartney signed set-list raised £140 from 12 supporters, an Ed Sheeran signed set-list raised £55 from 5 supporters, and signed set-lists from The 1975 and Bring Me The Horizon each raised £20 from 2 supporters. These are some of the biggest names in music. The name was not the problem. What was missing was active promotion, a prize worth wanting, and urgency.
What kind of prize works best in a charity prize draw?
In this dataset the strongest prizes were specific objects with provenance (Mark Knopfler's actual tour Stratocaster raised £68,733) and recurring-access passes (Frank Turner's lifetime guestlist pass raised £53,706 at the highest spend per supporter of any draw). Generic signed items consistently raised the least, even when the artist was globally famous and even when the urgent 2020 to 2021 context was present (a signed Camelphat plaque raised £100, a Disclosure keyboard £460). Provenance and access beat an autograph.
How much difference does adding a prize make versus a plain donation appeal?
Inside the same campaign, with the same audience and the same cause, Stagehand ran one straight donation appeal with no prize attached, 'Donate to Support the Unsung Heroes'. It reached 23% of its target. The prize draws around it routinely passed 100% of target. On that comparison, attaching a prize roughly multiplied the giving rate four to five times. This is the cleanest single finding in the dataset, because the only variable that changed was the prize.
What should a charity with a celebrity supporter actually ask them for?
Two things, in writing, as part of the ask: their active promotion of the draw to their own audience through their own channels, and a provenance prize the fans genuinely want, ideally a real object with a story or recurring access. The evidence here suggests the name alone sets a floor, not a result. Ed Sheeran's own numbers make the point: a signed set-list raised £55 in 2023, while his 2022 intimate-gig draw, an owned event he actively fronted, raised over £200,000. Same artist; the difference was the event and the promotion, not the fame.
Can you prove the prize and promotion caused these differences, rather than Covid urgency?
Not from the figures alone, and this case is careful not to claim otherwise. The big raises cluster in the urgent 2020 to 2021 rounds and the floor sits in the calmer December 2023 round, so urgency, prize quality and promotion all changed together between rounds. The cleaner comparisons are within a single round, where urgency is roughly held constant: in 2020 to 2021, provenance instruments raised £18,000 to £68,000 while generic-prize draws in the same round raised £100 to £2,000. That points hard at prize and promotion, but artist promotion was never systematically recorded, so it remains an unobserved variable. The honest reading is a strong pattern, not a proven cause.